Primary Care Physicians', Psychiatrists', and Oncologists' Coordination While Prescribing Medications for Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Coordination of medication prescribing is important in the care of patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) given the involvement of multiple providers and multiple medications used to manage MCC. The objective of this study was to identify physician and practice factors associated with physicians' coordination of prescribing for complex patients with MCC. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study used a 33-item anonymous, online survey to assess physicians' coordination practices while prescribing for patients with MCC. We sampled primary care physicians (PCPs), psychiatrists, and oncologists across the United States. Coordination of medication prescribing was measured on a 7-point Likert-type scale. χ2, Fisher exact test, and binomial logistic regression, adjusted for factors and covariates, were used to determine differences in coordination of prescribing. Average marginal effects were calculated for factors. RESULTS: A total of 50 PCPs, 50 psychiatrists, and 50 oncologists participated. Most psychiatrists (56%) and oncologists (52%) reported frequently coordinating prescribing with other physicians, whereas less than half of the PCPs (42%) reported frequently coordinating prescribing. Female physicians were 25% points more likely to report coordinating prescribing than male physicians (P = 0.0186), and physicians not using electronic medical records were 30% points more likely to report coordinating prescribing than physicians using electronic medical records (P = 0.0230). Four additional factors were associated with lower likelihood of coordinating prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Physician and practice factors may influence differences in coordination of medication prescribing, despite physician specialty. These factors can provide a foundation for developing interventions to improve coordination of prescribing practices for MCC.

Patient and Payer Incentives to Use Patented Brand-Name Drugs vs Authorized Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D.

Importance: In response to scrutiny over high drug prices, manufacturers of insulin and direct-acting antiviral agents for treating hepatitis C have recently introduced authorized generic alternatives to their patented brand-name products. These authorized generic drugs have list prices at least 50% lower than the list price of the brand-name drugs, which should result in savings to patients. However, it is unclear whether these authorized generic drugs are offered on Medicare Part D formularies because they may not provide savings to plans or Medicare. Objective: To assess Medicare Part D formulary coverage for 4 brand-name formulations of insulin and direct-acting antiviral agents and their authorized generic formulations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Formulary and Pricing Information Files from quarter 3 of 2020 and Medicare Part D plan enrollment for September 2020. Four patented brand-name drugs (sofosbuvir and velpatasvir fixed-dose combination tablets [Epclusa], ledipasvir and sofosbuvir tablets [Harvoni], insulin lispro [Humalog], and insulin aspart [Novolog]) and their authorized generic formulations for all Part D stand-alone prescription drug plans (n = 959) and Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (n = 3148) were studied. Main Outcomes and Measures: Beneficiary-weighted formulary coverage of brand-name and authorized generic products; beneficiary out-of-pocket costs; and prerebate plan, manufacturer, and Medicare spending on brand-name and authorized generic products. Results: In quarter 3 of 2020, 97% of beneficiaries were in plans that covered brand-name drugs only or both brand-name and authorized generic drugs; approximately 3% were in plans that covered authorized generic drugs only. Observed authorized generic drug list prices were 67%, 62%, and 50% lower than list prices for Epclusa, Harvoni, and each brand-name insulin product, respectively. Medicare beneficiaries using authorized generic drugs could save $270 per year for 12 vials of Humalog and $2974 for a full course of Harvoni. Plans, however, have limited incentives to encourage authorized generic drug use because rebates for brands likely exceed savings available with authorized generic drugs, particularly for beneficiaries with spending that reaches the Medicare Part D coverage gap. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that authorized generic drugs for insulin and direct-acting antiviral agents may lower out-of-pocket spending for patients but are unlikely to provide savings for Part D plans or Medicare. Instead, these drugs allow manufacturers to offer products at a lower list price without materially lowering net prices or profits.

Perceived appropriateness of medication adherence incentives.

BACKGROUND: 50% of prescriptions dispensed in the United States are not taken as prescribed, leading to approximately 125,000 deaths and 10% of hospitalizations per year. Incentives are effective in improving medication adherence; however, information about patient perceptions regarding incentives is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To (1) explore perceived appropriateness of incentives among patients prescribed at least 1 medication for chronic hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart disease, diabetes, and/or asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and (2) examine associations between perceived appropriateness and patient characteristics. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was administered via Qualtrics Panels to US adults taking at least 1 prescription medication for a chronic condition. The results describe patient preference for financial or social recognition-based incentive, perceived appropriateness of adherence incentives (5-point Likert scale), self-reported adherence (Medometer), and demographics. Analyses included descriptive statistics with chi-square and independent t-tests comparing characteristics between participants who perceived incentives as being appropriate or inappropriate and logistic regression to determine predictors of perceived appropriateness. RESULTS: 1,009 individuals completed the survey. Of the 1,009 total survey participants, 933 (92.5%) preferred to receive a financial (eg, cash, gift card, or voucher) rather than a social recognition-based incentive (eg, encouraging messages, feedback, individual recognition, or team competition) for medication adherence. 740 participants (73%) perceived medication adherence incentives as being appropriate or acceptable as a reward given for taking medications at the right time each day, whereas 95 (9%) perceived incentives as being inappropriate. Remaining participants were neutral. Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.37-0.89); income under $75,000 (OR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.28-0.84); no college degree (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.37-0.96); and adherence (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.98-0.99) were significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients perceived incentives as appropriate and preferred financial incentives over social recognition-based incentives. Perceived appropriateness for medication adherence incentives was less likely among certain groups of patients, such as those with Hispanic ethnicity, lower annual income, no college degree, and higher levels of adherence. These characteristics should be taken into account when structuring incentives. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Auburn University's Intramural Grants Program. Hansen, Qian, and Garza are affiliated with Auburn University. Hansen has provided expert testimony for Daiichi Sankyo and Takeda on unrelated matters. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare. This study was presented as a poster presentation at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting held July 2018 in Boston, MA.

Understanding authorized generics-A review of the published clinical data.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the large body of evidence demonstrating equivalent efficacy and safety for branded drugs and their generic counterparts, some patients and providers have the perception that generics may be less safe and effective than branded agents. Authorized generics (AGs) are a category of generic drugs defined by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as being the same as the brand-name drug without the brand's name on the label and which may have minor differences, such as tablet or capsule markings for identification. Studies in which AGs are considered along with other generics may increase our understanding of factors that may influence perceptions about generics and shed light on areas where education may be impactful. The objectives of this paper are to provide information about AGs, review studies in which they have been evaluated and explore the role that AGs may fill in the individualized treatment of patients. METHODS: A literature review was conducted on 30 September 2019 with follow-up search on 4 March 2020. The search was focussed on published papers and meeting abstracts that provided information on AGs with respect to medical and health outcomes of therapy as well as switching in individuals receiving branded, AG, or other generic agents. Information about patients' perceptions of generic medications and adherence to therapy was also included. Additional information, including relevant government sources, such as the FDA website and the Federal Trade Commission Report, was included as appropriate. RESULTS: The literature specific to AGs is limited, but available data clearly highlight the importance of patient perception of generics as well as medication appearance as factors that may affect adherence and potentially more frequent switchbacks to branded agents from generics or AGs. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first narrative review to provide a summary of the published evidence about AGs with respect to clinical and health outcomes and switching. There is a need for more research and education regarding the use of AGs in clinical practice if they are to become more recognized as a potential treatment choice for patients. Generic medications play an important role in the healthcare system, and AGs may be able to provide an option to meet the specific needs of individual patients.

Patient preferences for medication adherence financial incentive structures: A discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence for chronic conditions continues to be a challenge for patients. Patient incentives for medication adherence may help. Financial incentives delivered at the point of care may act as cues for medication-taking behavior. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate patient preferences for specific structures of financial medication adherence incentives that could feasibly be delivered at the point of care. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed using a national online survey. Study participants were adults who self-reported taking at least one prescription medication for one or more chronic conditions. Following an orthogonal design generated in SAS, the DCE included 32 paired-choice tasks. Data were analyzed using mixed logit models and stratified on participants' income level. RESULTS: In the full cohort (n = 933), form of financial reward (such as gift-card or cash) was 1.02 times as important to participants as the probability of incentive receipt, 1.58 times as important as monetary value, and 1.93 times as important as timing of receipt. Participants were willing to give up $31.04 of an incentive's monetary value (95% CI = $27.11-$34.98) to receive the incentive 5 months sooner (1-month vs. 6-month time-lag); $60.79 (95% CI = $53.19-$68.39) for probability of receipt to increase from a 1 out of 100 chance to a 1 out of 20 chance; and $10.52 (95% CI = $6.46-$14.58) to receive an incentive in the form of a Visa® gift-card instead of grocery store voucher. These patterns of trade-offs between attributes were generally consistent among participants with lower and higher income. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of socioeconomic status, patient preferences for financial medication adherence incentives delivered at the point of care may be most heavily influenced by incentive form and probability of receipt. This has implications for designing medication adherence programs in terms of incentive sustainability, patient engagement, plan star ratings, and patient outcomes.

Patient factors associated with oral generic olanzapine initiation and substitution among Medicaid beneficiaries: a new user cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Generic drugs typically are less expensive than branded products; however, several factors can limit generic drug utilization. This study assesses the associations of patient factors with generic olanzapine initiation and substitution. METHODS: A retrospective new user cohort study was conducted using the 2011-2012 Medicaid administrative claims data. Beneficiaries continuously enrolled during the 6 month washout period prior to their initial oral brand or generic olanzapine prescription were included and followed up to 12 months. Among brand olanzapine new users, time to generic substitution and competing risk outcomes was estimated using the Fine-Gray cumulative incidence function. Patient demographic and health service utilization factors were assessed in the multivariate cause-specific hazards model. RESULTS: Among olanzapine new users, 70.7% patients initiated generic treatment. Beneficiaries aged ≥21, and living in the Midwest and West regions were more likely to initiate generic olanzapine. Among brand new users, 28.2% switched to generic olanzapine, 23.6% switched to an alternative atypical antipsychotic treatment and 38.0% discontinued within 12 months. Beneficiaries who resided in urban areas (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR) = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.37-0.75) and had prior hospitalizations (AHR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75-0.96) had lower rates of generic substitution, whereas those with emergency department (ED) visits (AHR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10) had a higher rate of generic substitution. In addition, beneficiaries in different age subgroups also had different rates of generic substitution in different regions. CONCLUSION: Medicaid beneficiaries' age, geographic region, prior hospitalization and ED utilization were associated with generic olanzapine initiation and substitution. Tailored educational outreach targeting these patient subgroups might improve generic olanzapine utilization.

The impact of cognitive impairment on survival and medication adherence among older women with breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of preexisting cognitive impairments on survival and medication adherence, and whether chronic medication adherence mediates or moderates the association between cognitive impairments and mortality in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of older female patients diagnosed with breast cancer was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare Linked Database. We examined the risk of mortality from cancer and non-cancer causes in patients with and without a history of cognitive impairment. In addition, we examined if chronic medication adherence rates differ between these groups of patients and if medication adherence mediates or moderates the association between cognitive impairments and non-cancer mortality. RESULTS: Mortality from cancer-specific (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23) and non-cancer causes (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11-1.21) as well as all-cause mortality (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.38) was significantly higher in patients with cognitive impairments compared to those without cognitive impairment. Both groups showed low adherence levels to chronic medication before and after the breast cancer diagnosis. Further analysis did not show that medication adherence mediates or moderates the relationship between cognitive impairment and non-cancer mortality (p value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that older female patients with cognitive impairments and a breast cancer diagnosis have a heightened risk of cancer-specific and non-cancer mortality. Our findings do not indicate that chronic medication adherence plays a role in the association between a history of cognitive impairment and mortality, it is still necessary to further investigate this issue.

An Examination of Prescribing Responsibilities between Psychiatrists and Primary Care Providers.

Patients with comorbid mental health and chronic conditions often receive care from both psychiatrists and primary care physicians (PCPs). The introduction of multiple providers into the care process introduces opportunities for disruptions in care continuity. The purpose of this study was to explore psychiatrists' and PCPs' comfort prescribing, along with their comfort having other physician specialties prescribe medications for cardiometabolic, psychiatric, and neurological/behavioral conditions. This cross-sectional study utilized an online, validated, pilot-tested, anonymous survey to examine prescribing practices of psychiatrists and PCPs. Eligible participants included physicians with medical degrees, U.S. prescribing authority, and active patient care for ≥2 days/week. Outcomes of interest were physicians' self-comfort and cross-specialty comfort (other specialists prescribing mutual patients' medications) prescribing cardiometabolic, psychiatric, and neurological/behavioral medications. Comfort prescribing was measured using 7-point Likert scales. Discrepancies in comfort were analyzed using student's, one-sample, and paired t-tests. Multiple linear regressions examined associations between physician practice characteristics and physicians' comfort-level prescribing cardiometabolic and psychiatric medication categories. Among 50 psychiatrists and 50 PCPs, psychiatrists reported significantly lower self-comfort prescribing cardiometabolic medications (mean ± SD = 2.99 ± 1.63 vs. 6.77 ± 0.39, p < 0.001), but significantly higher self-comfort prescribing psychiatric medications (mean ± SD = 6.79 ± 0.41 vs. 6.00 ± 0.88, p < 0.001) and neurological/behavioral medications (mean ± SD = 6.48 ± 0.74 vs. 5.56 ± 1.68, p < 0.001) than PCPs. After adjusting for covariates, physician specialty was strongly associated with self-comfort prescribing cardiometabolic and psychiatric medication categories (both p < 0.001). Differences between self-comfort and cross-specialty comfort were identified. Because comfort prescribing medications differed by physician type, incorporating psychiatrists through collaborative methods with PCPs could potentially ensure comfort among physicians when initiating medications.

Patient and caregiver opinions about an FDA-developed generic drug educational handout: A pilot cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and caregiver opinions and "receptivity" regarding generic drug educational material in terms of content, format and design, delivery channel, and level of satisfaction. METHODS: Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted with patients and caregivers who were clients of a regional medication management program or pharmacy services clinic to gather perceptions about generic drugs and input on a generic drug educational handout developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Survey questions were developed by the investigators and pretested before use. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and responses to open-ended questions were assessed using qualitative content analysis. Survey psychometrics were examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). RESULTS: Of the 100 survey participants, most (93%) had positive perceptions about generic drug safety and effectiveness after reading the handout. Most participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the handout's content (87%) as well as format and design (92%). However, more than 20% of participants were still unsure about the benefits and risks of generic drugs compared with those of brand drugs, and more than 15% were still unsure about which benefits and risks mattered most to them. The participants' preferred source for the handout was a pharmacy (49%) or doctor's office (27%). In an EFA of the survey instrument, 2 factors emerged related to the educational handout's content: (1) generic drug information, a 7-item factor (Cronbach alpha = 0.882); and (2) personal relevance, a 3-item factor (Cronbach alpha = 0.692). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate an overall positive "receptiveness" toward generic drug informational materials from patients and caregivers, which highlights the feasibility and importance of educational outreach programs about generic drugs targeted toward this population. Future studies may focus on more diverse populations and tailor materials to the needs of specific patient and caregiver subgroups and health literacy levels.

Oral generic tacrolimus initiation and substitution in the Medicaid population: a new user cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Although existing studies have compared clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of generic with brand tacrolimus, little is known about generic tacrolimus utilization patterns or factors predicting generic substitution. This study examines associations between patient-level factors and generic tacrolimus initiation or substitution among new users of oral generic or brand-name tacrolimus. METHODS: This new user retrospective cohort study identified 374 beneficiaries who initiated generic or brand tacrolimus treatment, using 100% Medicaid administrative claims data from 11 states in 2011-2012. Outcomes were generic tacrolimus initiation and substitution within 12 months of treatment initiation. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with generic tacrolimus initiation and substitution. RESULTS: Two-thirds of oral tacrolimus new users initiated generic tacrolimus. Patients who were older age and black were significantly more likely to initiate generic tacrolimus (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.001-1.03; AOR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.40-4.62; respectively). Patients with more concomitant prescriptions, more comorbidities, or higher initial daily dosage had significantly lower likelihoods of initiating generic tacrolimus (AOR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; AOR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.77-0.99; AOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.993). Among brand tacrolimus new users, 23.6% substituted with generics within 12 months, and an addition of prior hospitalization or unit of initial daily dosage increment was associated with 35% (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02-1.76) or 2% (SHR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00-1.04) increase in likelihood of generic substitution, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding associations between patient-level factors with generic tacrolimus initiation and substitution could help practitioners and policymakers monitor treatment effect and facilitate generic tacrolimus utilization.

The association between antidepressants use and development of cognitive impairment among older women diagnosed with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the development of cognitive impairment and the use of antidepressants among older women with breast cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database to identify women who were 67 years old and older and had breast cancer between 2008 and 2013. Propensity scoring was used to account for confounding pre-treatment factors, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to examine the risk of developing cognitive impairment among patients based on whether they used antidepressants. RESULTS: A total of 3174 women taking antidepressants (mean age 75.2 ± 6.4) were matched with 3174 women not taking antidepressants (mean age 75.4 ± 6.7). Antidepressant use was associated with a significantly increased risk of cognitive impairment (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95%; confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.48). Additionally, we found that older women without a history of depression or anxiety who use antidepressants have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment than those who did not use antidepressants (HR: 1.53, 95%; CI: 1.34-1.75 and HR: 1.39, 95%; CI: 1.23-1.56, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that the use of non-tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) was associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: We found that non-TCA antidepressant use in older women with breast cancer was associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment. This association was also observed among older women without depression or anxiety who used antidepressants.

Generic escitalopram initiation and substitution among Medicare beneficiaries: A new user cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine patterns of generic escitalopram initiation and substitution among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This retrospective new user cohort used a 5% random sample of 2013-2015 Medicare administrative claims data. Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries continuously enrolled in Parts A, B, and D during a 6-month washout period prior to their initial generic or brand oral escitalopram prescriptions were included (n = 12,351). The primary outcomes were generic escitalopram treatment initiation, and among brand escitalopram initiators, generic substitution within 12 months. Patient demographics, health service utilization, and prescription level factors were measured and assessed. RESULTS: Among all escitalopram initiators, about 88.2% Medicare beneficiaries initiated generic escitalopram. Beneficiaries who were younger age, male, residing in non-Northeast regions or urban area, in the Part D plan deductible benefit phase, and filling prescriptions at community/retail pharmacies were more likely to initiate generic treatment. Among brand escitalopram initiators (n = 1,464), about 20.7% switched to generic escitalopram, 31.2% switched to another alternative antidepressant, 25.1% discontinued treatment, and 8.7% were lost to follow up or passed away within 12 months after brand initiation. Factors associated with generic escitalopram substitution included region (Midwest vs. Northeast, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.04-2.05), pre-index hospitalization (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.16-1.48) and lower escitalopram average daily dosage (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In 2013-2015, almost 90% Medicare beneficiaries initiated generic escitalopram treatment. Among brand escitalopram initiators, about 1 in 5 patients switched to generic escitalopram within 1 year, as compared to 1 in 4 or 1 in 3 who discontinued current or switched to alternative treatment, respectively. Medicare beneficiary's geographic region was independently associated with generic escitalopram initiation and substitution. Findings from this study not only provide up-to-date evidence in generic escitalopram use patterns among Medicare population, but also can guide educational and practice interventions to further increase generic escitalopram use.

Generic levothyroxine initiation and substitution among Medicare and Medicaid populations: a new user cohort study.

PURPOSE: Generic levothyroxine has been approved and available since 2004 but its substitution remains controversial. Therefore, the objective was to examine patterns of and identify factors associated with initiation and substitution of generic levothyroxine treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study, including new users of brand and generic levothyroxine in 2013-2015 Medicare (n = 15,877) or 2011-2012 Medicaid (n = 9390) administrative claim databases. The primary outcomes included (1) generic levothyroxine initiation, and (2) among brand-new users, generic levothyroxine substitution in 12 months. The factors associated with generic levothyroxine initiation and substitution were measured. RESULTS: Among all levothyroxine new users, Medicare beneficiaries had a higher proportion of generic levothyroxine initiation than Medicaid beneficiaries (66.40% vs. 44.04%, respectively). Medicare beneficiaries' demographic factors, and health service utilizations were associated with generic levothyroxine initiation. Medicaid beneficiaries who were male and residing in the northeast region and rural areas were more likely to initiate generic levothyroxine. Among brand levothyroxine new users, the generic substitution rate was higher in the Medicare than the Medicaid cohort (18.26 vs. 3.88%). Medicare brand levothyroxine new users' demographic factors and health service utilizations were associated with generic levothyroxine substitution. Medicaid brand levothyroxine new users who were residing in the northeast region, with more prior hospitalization, and initiating a lower dosage of brand levothyroxine, had higher rates of generic substitution. CONCLUSION: Patient demographic factors and health service utilizations are associated with generic levothyroxine initiation and substitution. Educational outreach programs targeted to increase generic levothyroxine use and prescription savings should be tailored based on different patient populations.

Comparison of 3 risk factor-based screening tools for the identification of prediabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare risk factor-based screening tools for identifying prediabetes. METHODS: Participants in an employer-based wellness program were tested for glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) at a regularly scheduled appointment, and prediabetes risk factor information was collected. The likelihood of having prediabetes and the need for laboratory testing were determined based on 3 risk factor-based screening tools: the Prediabetes Screening Test (PST), Prediabetes Risk Test (PRT), and 2016 American Diabetes Association guidelines (ADA2016). The results from the screening tools were compared with those of the A1C test. The predictive ability of the PST, PRT, and ADA2016 were compared using logistic regression. Results were validated with data from a secondary population. RESULTS: Of the 3 risk factor-based tools examined, the PRT demonstrated the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for identifying prediabetes. From July 2016 to March 2017, 740 beneficiaries of an employer-sponsored wellness program had their A1C tested and provided risk factor information. The population prevalence of prediabetes was 9.3%. Analysis of a second independent population with a prediabetes prevalence of more than 50% of confirmed PRT's superiority despite differences in the calculated sensitivity and specificity for each population. CONCLUSION: Because PRT predicts prediabetes better than PST or ADA2016, it should be used preferentially.

National trends in prescription proton pump inhibitor use and expenditure in the United States in 2002-2017.

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed classes of drugs, but contemporary data on national-level utilization patterns for PPI use are limited. This study examined the trends in prescription PPI use and expenditures, overall and by patient subgroups, and identified predictors of PPI use. METHODS: Prescription PPI use was identified from the 2002-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data using the brand and generic names. Trends in PPI use were examined overall and by patients' sociodemographic characteristics and disease status. Trends in brand and generic PPI users and total and average PPI expenditures were also examined. A multivariable model was used to identify patient factors associated with PPI use. RESULTS: The overall proportion of PPI users increased from 5.70% in 2002-2003 to 6.73% in 2016-2017 (P value = 0.011). Increased trends in PPI use were observed among U.S. adults aged 65 years and older, both males and females, non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, Asians, in all 4 geographic regions, with public health insurance, and those who were obese (all P value < 0.05). Whereas PPI use increased significantly, the average PPI expenditure per patient decreased significantly. Multivariable results found that participants who were aged 25 years or older, were female, were non-Hispanic whites, resided in the Northeast, had higher incomes, had public or private health insurance, were obese, were married had a higher likelihood of using PPIs. CONCLUSION: Increased PPI use was observed among most of the patient subgroups. Understanding the utilization patterns of PPIs could help practitioners identify potential treatment disparities and monitor the safety of PPI use.

How comfortable are primary care physicians and oncologists prescribing medications for comorbidities in patients with cancer?

BACKGROUND: Treating cancer and existing chronic comorbidities requires a dynamic mix of primary care and specialist providers. However, little is known regarding primary care physicians' (PCPs) and oncologists' comfort level prescribing for comorbid conditions. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to describe oncologists' and PCPs': 1) comfort-level prescribing, 2) perceptions of providers' role in prescribing cardiometabolic and psychiatric medications in persons with cancer and comorbidity, and 3) provider factors associated with comfort-levels. METHODS: This cross-sectional online survey examined responses from practicing U.S. PCPs and oncologists. A 33-question survey was used to assess PCPs' and oncologists' comfort-levels for prescribing 6 classes of medications used to treat common comorbid cardiometabolic or psychiatric conditions. Using t-tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher's Exact tests, physicians' own comfort and comfort with other physicians prescribing medications for shared patients were compared between PCPs and oncologists. Linear regression models were used to analyze predictors of comfort-level scale score for prescribing medications. RESULTS: Oncologists were more comfortable with PCPs initiating or refilling antidiabetics, antihyperlipidemics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics, and PCPs were more comfortable initiating antihypertensives, antidiabetics, antihyperlipidemics, antidepressants, and antipsychotics themselves as opposed to having an oncologist initiate or refill these medications. Compared to oncologists, PCPs reported a 32.3% higher comfort-level for initiating cardiometabolic medications (Adjusted Coefficient (standard error) = 0.323 (0.033), p < 0.001), and a 25.0% higher comfort-level for initiating psychiatric medications in cancer patients (Adjusted Coefficient (standard error) = 0.250 (0.030), p < 0.001), after controlling for prescriber demographics and practice site characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that when a cancer diagnosis is made for patients with pre-existing cardiometabolic or psychiatric conditions, oncologists prefer PCPs to manage these medications. This enhanced understanding of PCPs' and oncologists' comfort managing these medications may help develop a standard for defining physician roles in medication therapy as part of a shared care plan for patients with cancer and comorbidities.

Healthcare provider opinions about a generic drug educational newsletter.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the prescribing and dispensing of generic drugs, compared to branded drugs, may increase patient access to affordable drug treatments. Healthcare providers have information needs regarding generic drugs, but available, tailored education materials designed for provider use are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To examine healthcare provider opinions and receptivity regarding generic drug educational materials in content, format and design, delivery channel, and level of satisfaction. METHODS: A national online survey was conducted in summer 2018 to gather practicing healthcare prescribers' (i.e., physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) and pharmacists' opinions on an educational newsletter developed through a collaboration between the investigators and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Quantitative analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY), while responses to open-ended questions were assessed using qualitative content analysis in Excel. RESULTS: A total of 208 surveys were completed. Overall, participants expressed positive opinions about the newsletter's content and format/design. About 69% of prescribers and 60% of pharmacists stated the newsletter gave information that will help them better serve patients. While 15% of surveyed pharmacists stated that they did not have resources to help them get information on generic drug availability and cost, more prescribers (37%) responded similarly. Both prescribers and pharmacists preferred to receive this newsletter via email from the FDA or a professional association. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate the feasibility of educational outreach programs about generic drugs targeted towards healthcare providers. There is room for improvement in making prescribers and pharmacists aware of resources for learning about generic drug availability and cost. Future studies may test alternate versions of the newsletter that have been tailored to the needs of specific provider specialties or provider practices serving specific patient sub-groups, as well as preferred dissemination frequency.

Description of a pharmacist-led diabetes prevention service within an employer-based wellness program.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a pharmacist-led diabetes prevention service piloted within an employer-based wellness program. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: A pharmacist-led ambulatory care clinic within a school of pharmacy that provides wellness services to university employees. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Implementation of a diabetes prevention service using opportunistic A1C screening within a biometric screening program. Patients with a prediabetes-level A1C from July 2016 to March 2019 were invited to participate in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP). EVALUATION: Comparison of baseline characteristics of participants with normal and elevated A1C. Evaluation of participation in the NDPP and changes in clinical values at the subsequent biometric screening appointment for individuals with a prediabetes-level AlC. RESULTS: A1C testing of 740 individuals identified 69 participants (9.3%) with a prediabetes-level A1C and 7 (1.0%) with a diabetes-level A1C. Compared with those with a normal A1C (< 5.7%), participants with an elevated A1C were more likely to be older, nonwhite, obese, and physically inactive, to have a sibling with diabetes, higher random blood sugar (RBS), lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and more likely to have hypertension. Twelve patients participated in the NDPP, although most attended only 1 session. Attenders had a significantly lower baseline weight and body mass index (BMI). There were no significant differences in the changes in A1C, BMI, weight, RBS, or HDL between attenders and nonattenders approximately 1 year later. CONCLUSION: This pilot demonstrated that opportunistic A1C testing could be incorporated into an ambulatory care clinic within a pharmacist-led employer-based wellness program. Uptake and retention of the NDPP were poor. Barriers to NDPP participation need to be investigated and addressed to improve service impact.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use and Risk of Arrhythmia: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: This study compares the risks of arrhythmia among patients with depression receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and those receiving other classes of antidepressants and among patients with depression receiving citalopram-escitalopram and those receiving other SSRIs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the 2000-2011 National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Patients with depression who were new antidepressant users were included in the study sample. Propensity score matching was used to balance the covariates between the comparison groups. Crude incidence rates were generated by Poisson regressions, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the rates of arrhythmia among SSRI users and nonusers of SSRI antidepressants as well as between citalopram-escitalopram users and users of other SSRIs. FINDINGS: Neither SSRI (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.08) nor citalopram-escitalopram (HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.95-1.51) exposure was associated with a risk of arrhythmia compared with other, newer non-SSRI antidepressants or noncitalopram SSRIs. An increase in mortality was, however, observed among citalopram-escitalopram users (HR = 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.31). IMPLICATIONS: Citalopram, escitalopram, and other SSRIs were not associated with an elevated risk of arrhythmia compared with each other or with non-SSRI antidepressants. Nevertheless, citalopram and escitalopram were associated with an increase in mortality risk compared with other SSRIs and deserve further investigation.

Screening for CYP3A4 inhibition and induction coupled to parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) for prediction of botanical-drug interactions: The case of açaí and maca.

BACKGROUND: The consumption of botanical dietary supplements (BDS) is a common practice among the US population. However, the potential for botanical-drug interactions exists, and their mechanisms have not been thoroughly studied. CYP3A4 is an important enzyme that contributes to the metabolism of about 60% of clinically used drugs. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential for botanical-drug interactions of Lepidium meyenii Walpers (maca) root and Euterpe oleracea Mart. (açaí) berries, two commonly used BDS, when co-administered with CYP3A4-metabolized drugs. METHODS: In an attempt to decrease the general discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro studies, the absorption profiles, particularly for passive diffusion, of plant extracts were investigated. Specifically, the parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) model was utilized to simulate intestinal filtration of passively diffused constituents of açaí and maca extracts. These were subsequently screened for in vitro liver CYP3A4 inhibition and induction. In the inhibition assay, midazolam was used as the probe substrate on genotyped human liver microsomes (CYP3A5 null), and the production of its 1'-substituted metabolite when co-cultured with extract treatments was monitored. In the induction assay, extract treatments were applied to human primary hepatocytes, and quantitative PCR analysis was performed to determine CYP3A4 mRNA expression. RESULTS: Passively diffused constituents of the methanol açaí extract (IC50 of 28.03 µg/µl) demonstrated the highest inhibition potential, and, at 1.5 µg/µl, induced significant changes in CYP3A4 gene expression. The composition of this extract was further investigated using the chemometric tool Mass Profiler Professional (MPP) on liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) data. Subsequently, five compounds of interest characterized by high abundance or high permeability were extracted for further study. This included efforts in effective passive permeability determination and structural elucidation by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). CONCLUSION: The passively absorbable portion of a methanol açaí extract exhibited inhibition and induction effects on CYP3A4 suggesting the potential to produce botanical-drug interactions.